1 2 3

Latest News and Commentary

An Open Letter to Rogers – Re: Sportsnet One

Written on August 23, 2010 at 10:44, by HTTN

by HTTN’s Hamilton based writer - James Scarfone

sportsnetonelogo

Dear Rogers Communications:

You should know that the launching of Sportsnet One has been one of your worst business decisions to date.

Two weeks ago, you introduced your new sports channel amidst Canada’s already saturated TV sports market. From a male standpoint, it’s always a good thing to have more sports, of course.

Still, when we heard you were launching a new channel, Daniel Negreanuwe thought it was kind of silly. With TSN, TSN2, The Score, Sportsnet, The Golf Channel, pay-per-view NHL and a host of international broadcasters we can get online or via satellite, there are plenty of opportunities to watch sports on TV. Did you feel the need to squeeze some more poker into your already steady line-up of sports-radio-on-television and fishing?

Actually, a good chunk of us appreciated your thoughtfulness at perhaps sliding a darts or billiards game over to the new channel to maintain prime sporting action on the regular channel.

But that was our thinking, not yours. Your idea was to create a new, highly desirable sports channel that Canadian sports fans would die for, in order to put pressure on your rivals in the cable business.

And you went straight for the jugular, putting Blue Jays games, Premiership games and soon, NHL games on Sportsnet One. But apparently you failed to realize that by placing Jays games on the new network and letting Canadians discover that this channel was only available to Rogers subscribers, it was a slap to the face to all sports fans.

Cable subscribers in Canada have no choice but to subscribe to the company that owns their particular region. In Hamilton, for example, that means you have Cogeco in one part of the city, Shaw in another part and a couple smaller cable companies in other parts of the city of over half a million people. Rogers is not an option: it’s nowhere to be found.

Therefore, Hamiltonians cannot watch anything on Sportsnet One. Same thing out west. Shaw rules the day in western Canada along with Telus. Can’t get Rogers. Millions of cable subscribers (and hundreds of thousands of Jays fans) are blacked out of Sportsnet One’s programming.

You may have noticed that the SkyDome (we still call it that, just to spite you) had only 10,000 fans show up to Jays games in the early part of 2010. But when the team started playing better, the stadium began filling up. Toronto had the league’s home run leader and a solid pitching staff, and the fans were finally coming back.

skydome2Just another packed house at the SkyDome. (Don’t know why those 300 idiots aren’t wearing the same shade of blue as everyone else)

The Jays were receiving accolades around town. People wanted to go back to the Dome and start watching again on TV. Attendance and ratings went up.

Then you went and did this.

Newsflash Rogers: you own the very team you’ve made disappear on television! Most clubs would cultivate that newfound fanbase into everyday fans. Instead, you’ve squashed those fans like bugs. We’ve seen more Red Sox and Yankees games this week than our beloved Jays.

You need to realize that there aren’t many casual Jays fans in the UFC/NFL/NHL generation. The male 18-34 group doesn’t have as much time for baseball and you appear to have no intention in reversing that trend with your latest move.

We all remember what happened last year when many Toronto Raptors games were broadcast on the new TSN2. Rogers was the only provider that refused to place the new channel into their lineup, leaving many of your subscribers irate. In the end, though, you caved to the pressure.

Payback time: new channel, all yours. This time, the shoe would be on the other foot, and Canada would hate their non-Rogers service providers for not quickly adopting Sportsnet One.

It didn’t work. You are still the bad guys.

We haven’t forgotten that at the beginning of the season, we were promised every Jays game would be on Sportsnet. Every game. You failed to inform us a secret hidden channel, inaccessible to millions, would be broadcasting those games at the height of the season and in the middle of a playoff race.

So, Rogers, why is all this necessary? Why do you need to punish hard-working Canadians who just want to watch the Blue Jays, Man U, or eventually the Canucks, Flames, Oilers and Sens when the NHL starts in six weeks?

It all comes down to sports becoming a hot business property for cable companies. But Rogers, this was a bad move.

We urge you to reconsider placing important Jays games and Premiership matches on your new channel and put them back on the regular Sportsnet channel. Broaden your Jays fanbase by showcasing your product. It’s the only way you’ll get fans in the ballpark again, and it’s the only way we’ll start respecting you as a sports media baron.

Sincerely,


Canada’s Sports Fans




-to see James Scarfone’s previous post on the mess in Hamilton click here
-to see James Scarfone’s previous post on the August Blue Jays click here
-to see James Scarfone’s previous post, on the rise of Hamilton click here
-follow James Scarfone on twitter: @jamesscarfone

  • http://www.nflhutonline.com/an-open-letter-to-rogers-%e2%80%93-re-sportsnet-one/ An Open Letter to Rogers – Re: Sportsnet One | Nfl News And More

    [...] the original post: An Open Letter to Rogers – Re: Sportsnet One Categories: nfl Tags: business-decisions, hamilton, james-scarfone, launching, rogers, [...]

  • Fran

    As a fan I’m angered at Sportsnet. But where are the Sponsors in this mess? Low ratings has to hurt them too?
    Reminds me of when the CBC dropped the Expos…it was the beginning of the end of that Franchise.

  • Jack Swenson

    Excellent letter! Couldn’t agree with you more…even to the extent that Rogers changed the name of Skydome.

    Let us know what more we might do to have TV coverage of Blue Jays returned to Bell TV.

    Thanks.

    Jack Swenson

  • Marion McLeod

    I feel somewhat disgusted with Rogers putting most of the Blue Jays games on the new sportsnet1. It is an insult to Canadians(them being the only Canadian team)…personally I don’t care about the Yankees(as long as they get beat).

    As far as the advertisement goes “get free preview”….it isn’t free….when I enquired….you must have the box which is approx. $6.95 a mo.

    PLEASE reconsider your decision……

  • James S

    Just heard on Bob McCown’s Prime Time Sports this afternoon (Team 1410 in Vancouver, FAN 590 in Toronto) that a rumoured update on Sportsnet One is coming this week. Not sure what to expect but stay tuned.

    It was a bad move by Rogers and they haven’t gotten away with it. Jays fans have been consistenly complaining through talk shows, letters to newspapers and via Twitter and Facebook. It’s a hot topic to be sure. They’ve been supported by influential media as well. Rogers has created a firestorm by themselves with the decision to move a bunch of Jays games and soccer matches to a channel many people can’t get.

    I suspect Rogers won’t go back on their decision anytime soon. The Jays are out of playoff contention and it’s still early in the Premiership season. But, NHL starts soon and that’s when you’ll get some real backlash. The other cable companies will likely approve Rogers’ contract to air Sportsnet One and hockey fans will be united.